EXAMPLEIllustrative example · fictional restaurant «Sazón de Origen». Not your data: your result is built with YOUR restaurant's.See the assistant →
Sazón de OrigenFictional contemporary Colombian restaurant in Medellín, 2 locations, 6 years in business. Every sample result in the library comes from this same case.
General Management and Strategy

Sample result

Decision Verdict Builder for Restaurants

The owner asked this:«The lease on location 2 expires in six weeks. Do I renew for three years, negotiate just one, or move?»

① The decision, in three lines

The sentence: before October 6, decide whether location 2 renews its lease for 3 years, renews for 1 year, or relocates within the same neighborhood.

The real deadline: October 6. The owner did not set it: the contract requires 60 days' notice, and what rules here is the calendar, not the urge to think about it a while longer.

The type of door: one that closes behind you. Three years of rent cannot be undone on reasonable evidence, so this decision demands hard evidence and location 2's break-even calculated on its own, never the consolidated figure for both.

And one referee's note before scoring: the decision arrived with two options, "renew or move". It is almost never two. Four compete here, and one of them is doing nothing.

② The weighted matrix, with weights fixed before seeing the options

The weights were agreed and written down before a single option was scored. It is the only way to stop the weighting bending toward the favorite.

CriterionWeightA · Renew 3 yearsB · Renew 1 yearC · RelocateD · Let it lapseEvidence cited
Effect on operating margin30%7682Location 2 rent over its last 8 weeks of sales
Cash at risk over 6 months25%8935Quoted fit-out and 3 weeks with no service in a move
Execution capacity of the 24 people20%9946Neither location has a written opening protocol today
Reversibility15%2934SUPUESTO: the landlord accepts one year with an adjustment. Unconfirmed
Customer and location10%8858Neighborhood families, the reason location 2 opened there in 2024
Weighted100%7.008.004.904.45

Verdict: B, renew for one year. It does not win on rent —A is cheaper per square meter— but on reversibility and cash: one year turns a door that closes into one that can be opened again, exactly while the house does the cost work that will say whether location 2 deserves three years.

The criterion that was not declared: B stings this owner because he fears the landlord will raise the rent in 12 months. That is a criterion, not a hunch, which is why it went into the table with a name and a weight instead of sitting underneath it. Confirming the adjustment with the landlord is the week's first task, not its last.

The full example has 1 more part(s): you see them inside the library, with your account.