AI assistant · N3 Analysis with a verdict
Menu Pricing Strategy Builder for Restaurants
Designs your menu's complete pricing policy: ladder per category, endings consistent with your positioning, a safe order for raising prices and differentiated rates where platform commissions eat the margin.
N3Analysis with a verdict
Crosses YOUR numbers and takes a stand, with a table, units and currency. Not options: a recommendation you can defend.
◆ This assistant 24 of the 164 published assistants are at this levelIs this for you?
What it does and what you get
- Raising prices is scary and not raising them is expensive: most owners live between those poles, adjusting for inflation when they cannot hold out any longer and crossing their fingers.
- This assistant replaces fear with policy: it analyzes each category's price ladder, defines endings and thresholds per your positioning, sets the order in which to touch prices to risk the least, and separates dine-in rates from platform rates, where selling at the same price often means selling at a loss unknowingly.
What you end up with
The documented pricing policy: per-category ladder with corrected gaps, ending rules, adjustment sequence with a risk traffic light and channel-differentiated rate card.
EXAMPLE This is what you getAn example built with Sazón de Origen, the house's fictional restaurant.Not your data: your result is built with YOUR restaurant's.See the full example →Sample result
The owner asked this: «I have not touched prices in fourteen months and my goal for the year is to raise margin WITHOUT raising menu prices. Is this policy any use, or do I skip it?»
Your goal forbids raising the price of a published reference. It forbids nothing that follows.
| Lever | Does it raise a menu price? | Does it happen this year? |
|---|---|---|
| Technical floor per dish | No: it is a limit, not a move | Yes |
| Fixing the ladder by opening room above with additions | No: current prices stay put | Yes |
| Ending rules and thresholds | No: it sets how future numbers get written | Yes |
| Channel rate card | No: the platform menu is another channel, not the house menu | Yes |
| Adjustment sequence with a traffic light | Yes | Written and dated for month 13 |
Four of the five levers run this year. The fifth is documented with its order, so that the day it is needed it does not get decided in an afternoon. Having no policy is not the same as not raising prices: the first is paid every month, the second is a decision.
First, a stop. The house's costing is 7 months old. This assistant's rule is not to build policy on numbers older than 3 months: that would be decorating a mistake. Everything that follows carries that reservation, and step 1 of the plan is re-costing the eight highest-rotation references.
| Category | Ladder today (COP) | Gap | Diagnosis |
|---|---|---|---|
| Desserts | 28,000 · 28,000 · 28,000 · 28,000 · 29,000 | 1.04x | Five dishes crowded into 1,000 COP. There is nowhere to trade up: the whole section is nailed to the floor of the house range |
| To share | 68,000 · 70,000 · 70,000 | 1.03x | Three references, two at the same price. Same disease, less volume |
| Fish | 58,000 · 66,000 · 66,000 | 1.14x | Two tied at 66,000: the customer has nothing to choose between them with |
| From the stove | 38,000 · 40,000 · 46,000 · 60,000 | 1.58x | A correct ladder over a 4-reference category that adds up to 129 units a month. Here the problem is not price |
| Soups and broths | 28,000 · 30,000 · 34,000 · 50,000 · 60,000 | 2.14x | A 16,000 COP hole between the mote (34,000) and the ajiaco (50,000). Whoever will not spend 50,000 drops to 34,000 |
| Starters and picadas | 28,000 · 29,000 · 30,000 · 34,000 · 38,000 · 68,000 | 2.43x | Five crammed at the bottom and one alone on top, 30,000 away. At 2.43x it scrapes the point where a category splits into two markets |
| Traditional mains | 38,000 · 40,000 · 44,000 · 46,000 · 48,000 · 54,000 · 62,000 · 72,000 | 1.89x | The only healthy ladder on the menu. Eight even rungs inside the safe gap |
Your declared range is 28,000 – 72,000 COP and you are using a third of it. 17 of the 34 references live between 28,000 and 40,000; from 66,000 up there are seven. The 48,000 average ticket explains itself — not by what you charge, but by where you put the rungs.
Illustrative example generated with a fictional restaurant. Not a promise of results, not a client case.
This is 2 of 3 parts. Behind the wall: the **channel rate card** with net margin demonstrated dish by dish and its SUPUESTO line on the commission, the five ending rules with their thresholds, and the **sequence with a traffic light** separating what runs this week from what is dated for month 13.
See the full example — free accountWorks with these AIs
How to use it
Which of your data it uses
This assistant works with 8 of the 23 fields in «My Restaurant», among them Menu price range, Dish descriptions (paste your menu) and Average check (with currency). It does not ask out of curiosity: these are what make the answer speak about YOUR scale instead of an industry average — the same calculation on a business of another size returns a number you cannot decide with. You fill them once and they apply across the library, so the second assistant you open already starts with them in place. Whatever you leave blank, the assistant asks for one thing at a time instead of inventing it, and says so before answering, so you know what it is working from.
Always up to date
Every assistant carries a visible version and date. When an AI changes how it works, the assistant's version goes up and you see what changed.
v1.1.32026-08-26TASK now uses the restaurant's data instead of naming it only in the header. `motor/arraigo.py` had it below the house minimum: it named the client's data in YOUR RESTAURANT and then worked without it. The method was not touched -it was well written-: what changes is that the work is now done AGAINST the restaurant's figures.v1.1.22026-08-14Spelling: Spanish accents restored in the prose. No field marker, link or meaning changed.v1.1.12026-08-14Spelling fix: año/años with ñ in the Spanish text (markers untouched).v1.1.02026-08-13Rewritten under the margin mandate: 6 steps from ladder audit to channel rate card, 5 named output blocks with columns, 8 business fields, named policy traps, verification checklist and figures with units.v1.0.02026-08-09Version inicial de la biblioteca viva.More assistants in this category
Reads your sales mix like a consultant would: concentration per dish, popularity index by category, daypart an…
N3 · Analysis with a verdictBuilds the complete menu engineering matrix for your menu: every dish classified by cash contribution margin a…
N4 · Executable planNames your new dishes and rescues the ones nobody orders: twelve candidates, four verifiable discard criteria …
Included in the always-growing library
Access to every published assistant, adapted to your AI and personalised with your restaurant's data, updates included.