Sample result
Expert-Agent Board of Directors Builder for Restaurants
The owner asked this:«We are Sazón de Origen, one location, two partners. The owner of the unit next door offers us an expansion on an 8-year lease with 120 million of works. We sell 40 million a month; last year I switched protein supplier without looking much and it cost me 9 million. I have no board of anything: my partner and I decide over coffee.»
① The verdict · the four cards at the top of the Boardroom
| House yardstick: 10 % of monthly sales ($40,000,000) | $4,000,000 |
| …or 3 months of profit | $10,440,000 (flagged assumption: 8.7 % profit) |
| Decisions in the last year that crossed the yardstick | 3 of 6 (protein supplier, the new menu, the expansion on the table today) |
| What the one that went wrong cost | $9,000,000 — 2.2 times the yardstick |
| What a session costs | 45 minutes of reading per partner; ≈ $525,000 valued at a lawyer's rate (assumption: $350,000 an hour) |
You need a board on demand with a quarterly ordinary session, not a monthly one: three decisions a year above the yardstick and a 120 M expansion on the table —30 times the yardstick— justify seating it this week in VERDICT mode; each month's closing goes in QUICK mode until there are six months of clean spreadsheets. Below the cards, the chart: five bars in money against the yardstick line, the supplier's in red with its $9,000,000.
② My board's charter · the panel copied with one button
``` BUSINESS ................. Sazón de Origen WHAT IT IS ............... chef-driven restaurant with regional produce, one location, Pereira CURRENCY ................. COP WHO DECIDES .............. two partners, equal shares RISK PROFILE ............. moderate (declared by the partners) MAXIMUM LOSS ............. PENDING: the partners write a figure; without it the wealth and risk fronts do not sit HORIZON .................. 5 years NOT NEGOTIABLE ........... the chef-driven concept and not lowering the 38,000 check; no unlimited personal guarantee ``` In the Boardroom the PENDING line is in amber and gets written over; «Copy the charter» copies the block as it stands.
③ The standing quorum · what lights up with «today's decision: the expansion»
| Front | Always sit | Why, with the house's datum | On call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Financial | `financiero` · `suministro_foodcost` | food cost at 36 % against a 28–35 range by concept: the front furthest from its threshold today, and the one that reads the 120-million works as payback with ramp | `financiamiento` · `tributario` |
| Market and demand | `consumidor` · `inmobiliario` | an expansion is a decision about square metres and rent: occupancy cannot exceed 8–10 % of sales | `mercado` · `marketing_lanzamiento` |
| Execution and operations | `operaciones` · `riesgo` | 14 people and one location: the works are run by the same team for six months | `cisnes_negros` · `legal_migratorio` · `talento_laboral` · `tecnologia` |
| Wealth | `patrimonial` | two partners and 120 million of works: each one's exposure has to fit inside their maximum loss | — |
| Human dimension | `psicologia_familiar` | two partners who decide over coffee with no written pact: someone has to ask whether both want this or one is dragging the other | `sucesion` |
The Boardroom's selector: with «today's decision» nine seats light up —`inmobiliario`, `patrimonial`, `legal_migratorio`, `financiero`, `financiamiento`, `riesgo`, `operaciones`, `psicologia_familiar`, `cisnes_negros`—; with «a spreadsheet», the whole financial front and operations; with «a lease», real estate, wealth, legal and finance.
⑧ The first session's table · what you see when you press a seat
Twelve seats around the table —nine from today's decision's quorum and three on call who raised a hand—, each with the AI Board's icon and name, a ring in the colour of its traffic light and its vote as a badge. 1 in favour · 8 conditional · 3 against; provisional verdict ORANGE.
| Seat | Ruling criterion, with its datum | Vote | What it is missing |
|---|---|---|---|
| `riesgo` · Experto AI en Riesgo | NO-GO threshold red: it does not exist, the maximum loss is PENDING | ✗ against | each partner's maximum loss, as a figure |
| `patrimonial` · Wealth / Family Office | wealth governance red: two partners with no written pact | ✗ against | partners' pact and the cash after the works |
| `financiero` · Finance | payback amber: 42 months demand 2.9 M a month, 84 % of today's profit | ◐ conditional | fixed / variable split and the new square metres' sales |
| `inmobiliario` · Real Estate and Zones | rent by zone no data: the new rent is PENDING | ◐ conditional | rent, increases and exit clause |
| `consumidor` · Consumer Behaviour (on call) | frequency green: tables turned away Thursday to Saturday | ✓ in favour | tables turned away per night |
| `suministro_foodcost` · Food Cost (on call) | food cost red: 36 %, 1 to 8 points outside the range | ✗ against | food cost by family, two weeks of POS |
Scoreboard by front (the package's scoring model): financial 4.9 red · market 7.8 amber · execution 4.5 red · wealth 2.0 red · human 6.4 orange · brand and legal UNVERIFIED. A simulation with today's data: the definitive vote is cast by the package's board.
The full example has 1 more part(s): you see them inside the library, with your account.