Sample result
AI Board of Directors Tool Creator for Restaurants
The owner asked this:«We are Sazón de Origen, Medellín's Centro location, two partners. The owner of the unit next door offers us an expansion on an 8-year lease with 120 million of works. We sell 40 million a month; last year I switched protein supplier without looking much and it cost me 9 million. I have no board of anything: my partner and I decide over coffee.»
① The verdict · the four cards at the top of the Boardroom
| House yardstick: 10 % of monthly sales ($40,000,000) | $4,000,000 |
| …or 3 months of profit | $10,440,000 (flagged assumption: 8.7 % profit) |
| Decisions in the last year that crossed the yardstick | 3 of 6 (protein supplier, the new menu, the expansion on the table today) |
| What the one that went wrong cost | $9,000,000 — 2.2 times the yardstick |
| What a session costs | 45 minutes of reading per partner; ≈ $525,000 valued at a lawyer's rate (assumption: $350,000 an hour) |
You need a board on demand with a quarterly ordinary session, not a monthly one: three decisions a year above the yardstick and a 120 M expansion on the table —30 times the yardstick— justify seating it this week in VERDICT mode; each month's closing goes in QUICK mode until there are six months of clean spreadsheets. Below the cards, the chart: five bars in money against the yardstick line, the supplier's in red with its $9,000,000.
② My board's charter · the panel copied with one button
``` BUSINESS ................. Sazón de Origen WHAT IT IS ............... contemporary Colombian restaurant, Centro location, Medellín CURRENCY ................. COP WHO DECIDES .............. two partners, equal shares RISK PROFILE ............. moderate (declared by the partners) MAXIMUM LOSS ............. PENDING: the partners write a figure; without it the wealth and risk fronts do not sit HORIZON .................. 5 years NOT NEGOTIABLE ........... the house concept and not lowering the 48,000 check; no unlimited personal guarantee ``` In the Boardroom the PENDING line is in amber and gets written over; «Copy the charter» copies the block as it stands.
③ The standing quorum · what lights up with «today's decision: the expansion»
| Front | Always sit | Why, with the house's datum | On call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Financial | `financiero` · `suministro_foodcost` | food cost at 36 % against a 28–35 range by concept: the front furthest from its threshold today, and the one that reads the 120-million works as payback with ramp | `financiamiento` · `tributario` |
| Market and demand | `consumidor` · `inmobiliario` | an expansion is a decision about square metres and rent: occupancy cannot exceed 8–10 % of sales | `mercado` · `marketing_lanzamiento` |
| Execution and operations | `operaciones` · `riesgo` | 14 people at the Centro location: the works are run by the same team for six months | `cisnes_negros` · `legal_migratorio` · `talento_laboral` · `tecnologia` |
| Wealth | `patrimonial` | two partners and 120 million of works: each one's exposure has to fit inside their maximum loss | — |
| Human dimension | `psicologia_familiar` | two partners who decide over coffee with no written pact: someone has to ask whether both want this or one is dragging the other | `sucesion` |
The Boardroom's selector: with «today's decision» nine seats light up —`inmobiliario`, `patrimonial`, `legal_migratorio`, `financiero`, `financiamiento`, `riesgo`, `operaciones`, `psicologia_familiar`, `cisnes_negros`—; with «a spreadsheet», the whole financial front and operations; with «a lease», real estate, wealth, legal and finance.
⑧ The first session's table · what you see when you press a seat
Twelve seats around the table —nine from today's decision's quorum and three on call who raised a hand—, each with the AI Board's icon and name, a ring in the colour of its traffic light and its vote as a badge. 1 in favour · 8 conditional · 3 against; provisional verdict ORANGE.
| Seat | Ruling criterion, with its datum | Vote | What it is missing |
|---|---|---|---|
| `riesgo` · Experto AI en Riesgo | NO-GO threshold red: it does not exist, the maximum loss is PENDING | ✗ against | each partner's maximum loss, as a figure |
| `patrimonial` · Wealth / Family Office | wealth governance red: two partners with no written pact | ✗ against | partners' pact and the cash after the works |
| `financiero` · Finance | payback amber: 42 months demand 2.9 M a month, 84 % of today's profit | ◐ conditional | fixed / variable split and the new square metres' sales |
| `inmobiliario` · Real Estate and Zones | rent by zone no data: the new rent is PENDING | ◐ conditional | rent, increases and exit clause |
| `consumidor` · Consumer Behaviour (on call) | frequency green: tables turned away Thursday to Saturday | ✓ in favour | tables turned away per night |
| `suministro_foodcost` · Food Cost (on call) | food cost red: 36 %, 1 to 8 points outside the range | ✗ against | food cost by family, two weeks of POS |
Scoreboard by front (the package's scoring model): financial 4.9 orange · market 7.8 amber · execution 4.5 red · wealth 2.0 red · human 6.4 amber · brand and legal NOT CONVENED; with a red front the global goes no higher than orange (contract mr-junta/1). The fourteen guardians review the draft: legal and risk block and are corrected, three warn, three do not apply. A simulation with today's data: the definitive vote is cast by the package's board.
The full example has 1 more part(s): you see them inside the library, with your account.