Who is this assistant for?

You have a big decision on your plate —a lease, a second location, raising prices— and you are taking it with a friend's opinion and your gut. You have a finance spreadsheet nobody reads with judgement, and every month closes without you knowing which front is in the red. You already tried asking an AI to be an "expert committee" and got twenty generic opinions that would fit any restaurant. Your house has fronts no opening report covers: delivery with its aggregators, your own kitchen, your country's tax regime.

An expert board of directors is not bought ready-made nor improvised in a chat: the hard part —twenty-three deep profiles with frameworks, thresholds, diagnostic questions and what each expert refuses to sign; fourteen guardians who check that the figures add up and that the verdict says the same as the votes; four modes and an eight-step session protocol— is already solved and sealed inside the AI Board of Directors tool folder you download from your library. What no universal folder can bring is YOUR restaurant: who decides in your house and how much you are willing to lose, which decisions cross the yardstick that justifies seating a board, which experts always sit for your kind of business, with which thresholds recalibrated to your city, and which fronts of your house —delivery, your kitchen, your country's tax regime— none of the twenty-three covers. That is what this assistant does, and in the right order: first it tells you with figures whether you need a monthly board, one on demand or only the quick mode; then it writes the charter and the quorum; then it recalibrates the thresholds and creates your guest seats —expert agents of your own, with the same profile as the rest—; and only then does it leave you the first session's brief and the governance with its indicator and its ninety-day switch-off rule. Anything you have not told it stays marked as PENDING, never filler: an invented maximum loss leaves two fronts of the board working on a false figure. And it hands it to you the way a board is used, not the way a chat is read: in the Boardroom, one HTML file on the MASTERESTAURANT Visual Kit, with the verdict on top in four cards, the charter you fill in and copy with one button, the quorum that lights up according to what is on the table, the thresholds with their state and the calendar with the switch-off date; it opens with no internet and prints on A4 for the first session.

AI assistant · N5 Complete system

◆ Included in the annual plan🤖 Specialized AI Agentsv1.4.0 · 2026-10-30

📁 Needs an AI that builds files — Claude with Cowork or Claude Code📚 Works best with an AI that reads long documents in one pass (your full menu, a manual) · optional📊 Works best with an AI that reads Excel or Sheets (Claude for Excel, ChatGPT, Copilot in Microsoft 365) · optional

AI Board of Directors Tool Creator for Restaurants

The table already exists and you can download it: twenty-three experts with deep profiles and fourteen guardians who deliberate on whatever you put in front of them —a spreadsheet, a lease, two suppliers, a second location— and return minutes with a verdict. What is missing is for it to be YOUR restaurant's board.

This assistant produces the verdict on whether it serves you and for which decisions, writes your board's charter ready to paste, seats the standing quorum by front, recalibrates the thresholds to your market, creates your own expert agents with the same profile and leaves you the first session's brief and the governance with its switch-off rule, and hands it all to you in the Boardroom: one HTML file on the Visual Kit that opens with no internet, with the charter you copy with one button the quorum that lights up according to what you put on the table and the first session's table with every expert seated, its criteria and its vote.

Depth

17/24

Your data

Compatible AIs

Steps to use it

Depth of the resulttap a level to see what you get

◀ Put out today's fireRun the year ▶

🏛️

N5Complete system

Several chained pieces you install and operate over time, with their review cadence. It changes how the business runs, not one decision.

◆ This assistant 117 of the 170 published assistants are at this level

Is this for you?

What it does and what you get

An expert board of directors is not bought ready-made nor improvised in a chat: the hard part —twenty-three deep profiles with frameworks, thresholds, diagnostic questions and what each expert refuses to sign; fourteen guardians who check that the figures add up and that the verdict says the same as the votes; four modes and an eight-step session protocol— is already solved and sealed inside the AI Board of Directors tool folder you download from your library.
What no universal folder can bring is YOUR restaurant: who decides in your house and how much you are willing to lose, which decisions cross the yardstick that justifies seating a board, which experts always sit for your kind of business, with which thresholds recalibrated to your city, and which fronts of your house —delivery, your kitchen, your country's tax regime— none of the twenty-three covers.
That is what this assistant does, and in the right order: first it tells you with figures whether you need a monthly board, one on demand or only the quick mode; then it writes the charter and the quorum; then it recalibrates the thresholds and creates your guest seats —expert agents of your own, with the same profile as the rest—; and only then does it leave you the first session's brief and the governance with its indicator and its ninety-day switch-off rule.
Anything you have not told it stays marked as PENDING, never filler: an invented maximum loss leaves two fronts of the board working on a false figure.
And it hands it to you the way a board is used, not the way a chat is read: in the Boardroom, one HTML file on the MASTERESTAURANT Visual Kit, with the verdict on top in four cards, the charter you fill in and copy with one button, the quorum that lights up according to what is on the table, the thresholds with their state and the calendar with the switch-off date; it opens with no internet and prints on A4 for the first session.

What you end up with

Your house's Boardroom in one HTML file that opens with no internet, on the Visual Kit, with the seven pieces: the verdict with your figures —the yardstick in money, how many decisions in the year crossed it, what the one that went wrong cost and whether you need a monthly board, one on demand or only the quick mode— on top in cards and with the chart of your decisions against the yardstick; your board's charter with PENDING items flagged, filled in on the same screen and copied with one button; the standing quorum by front that lights up according to what you put on the table; the thresholds recalibrated to your market in four states, with a filter and with your three figures contrasted in points; one to three guest seats with the complete profile; the first session's brief with the chosen mode; and the calendar with the secretary, the indicator with target and baseline and the switch-off date ninety days out; and the first session's table, with every expert seated, its criteria in colour, its provisional vote and the scoreboard by front, flagged as a simulation.

It prints on A4 without splitting a piece.

EXAMPLE This is what you getAn example built with Sazón de Origen, one of the house's fictional businesses.Not your data: your result is built with YOUR restaurant's.See the full example →

Watch it work

LIVE · SESSION PANELThe board in actionA real session of the 23 seats and 14 guardians, step by step, with each one's file a click away. Opens without an account (in Spanish).23seats14guardians8steps▶ See the board in action

Sample result

Sazón de OrigenFictional contemporary Colombian restaurant in Medellín, 2 locations, 6 years in business. Every sample result in the library comes from this same case. Fictional house

The owner asked this: «We are Sazón de Origen, Medellín's Centro location, two partners. The owner of the unit next door offers us an expansion on an 8-year lease with 120 million of works. We sell 40 million a month; last year I switched protein supplier without looking much and it cost me 9 million. I have no board of anything: my partner and I decide over coffee.»


House yardstick: 10 % of monthly sales ($40,000,000)	$4,000,000
…or 3 months of profit	$10,440,000 (flagged assumption: 8.7 % profit)
Decisions in the last year that crossed the yardstick	3 of 6 (protein supplier, the new menu, the expansion on the table today)
What the one that went wrong cost	$9,000,000 — 2.2 times the yardstick
What a session costs	45 minutes of reading per partner; ≈ $525,000 valued at a lawyer's rate (assumption: $350,000 an hour)

You need a board on demand with a quarterly ordinary session, not a monthly one: three decisions a year above the yardstick and a 120 M expansion on the table —30 times the yardstick— justify seating it this week in VERDICT mode; each month's closing goes in QUICK mode until there are six months of clean spreadsheets. Below the cards, the chart: five bars in money against the yardstick line, the supplier's in red with its $9,000,000.

Front	Always sit	Why, with the house's datum	On call
Financial	`financiero` · `suministro_foodcost`	food cost at 36 % against a 28–35 range by concept: the front furthest from its threshold today, and the one that reads the 120-million works as payback with ramp	`financiamiento` · `tributario`
Market and demand	`consumidor` · `inmobiliario`	an expansion is a decision about square metres and rent: occupancy cannot exceed 8–10 % of sales	`mercado` · `marketing_lanzamiento`
Execution and operations	`operaciones` · `riesgo`	14 people at the Centro location: the works are run by the same team for six months	`cisnes_negros` · `legal_migratorio` · `talento_laboral` · `tecnologia`
Wealth	`patrimonial`	two partners and 120 million of works: each one's exposure has to fit inside their maximum loss	—
Human dimension	`psicologia_familiar`	two partners who decide over coffee with no written pact: someone has to ask whether both want this or one is dragging the other	`sucesion`

The Boardroom's selector: with «today's decision» nine seats light up —`inmobiliario`, `patrimonial`, `legal_migratorio`, `financiero`, `financiamiento`, `riesgo`, `operaciones`, `psicologia_familiar`, `cisnes_negros`—; with «a spreadsheet», the whole financial front and operations; with «a lease», real estate, wealth, legal and finance.

Twelve seats around the table —nine from today's decision's quorum and three on call who raised a hand—, each with the AI Board's icon and name, a ring in the colour of its traffic light and its vote as a badge. 1 in favour · 8 conditional · 3 against; provisional verdict ORANGE.

Seat	Ruling criterion, with its datum	Vote	What it is missing
`riesgo` · Experto AI en Riesgo	NO-GO threshold red: it does not exist, the maximum loss is PENDING	✗ against	each partner's maximum loss, as a figure
`patrimonial` · Wealth / Family Office	wealth governance red: two partners with no written pact	✗ against	partners' pact and the cash after the works
`financiero` · Finance	payback amber: 42 months demand 2.9 M a month, 84 % of today's profit	◐ conditional	fixed / variable split and the new square metres' sales
`inmobiliario` · Real Estate and Zones	rent by zone no data: the new rent is PENDING	◐ conditional	rent, increases and exit clause
`consumidor` · Consumer Behaviour (on call)	frequency green: tables turned away Thursday to Saturday	✓ in favour	tables turned away per night
`suministro_foodcost` · Food Cost (on call)	food cost red: 36 %, 1 to 8 points outside the range	✗ against	food cost by family, two weeks of POS

Scoreboard by front (the package's scoring model): financial 4.9 orange · market 7.8 amber · execution 4.5 red · wealth 2.0 red · human 6.4 amber · brand and legal NOT CONVENED; with a red front the global goes no higher than orange (contract mr-junta/1). The fourteen guardians review the draft: legal and risk block and are corrected, three warn, three do not apply. A simulation with today's data: the definitive vote is cast by the package's board.

Illustrative example generated with a fictional restaurant. Not a promise of results, not a client case.

This is 4 of 5 parts. Behind the wall are **the eleven thresholds with their state filter and the three-figure chart**, **the two complete guest-seat profiles**, **the first session's brief in VERDICT mode with its copy button**, **the calendar with the secretary, the indicator and the switch-off date worked out** and **the complete table with its twelve seats and their criteria**.

See the full example — free account

Works with these AIs

Claude — the best for this assistant The one that builds the file: it reads the whole folder —the 23 profiles are 197 KB— and writes the Boardroom as an HTML that opens with no internet, with the charter, the quorum and the guest seats inside. AIs that do not build files are not offered here: they would return code pasted in the chat.

How to use it

Fill in your monthly sales, food cost, labour cost and average ticket in My Restaurant: the thresholds are recalibrated and your board's yardstick is calculated against those four figures.

Before you start, be clear about who decides in your house, how much you are willing to lose on one decision —as a figure— and which decision or spreadsheet you will put on the table first.

Copy the whole assistant and paste it into your AI. Get the verdict in the chat, give your go-ahead and receive the Boardroom: an HTML file that opens with a double click, with no internet.

Open the Boardroom: fill in whatever says PENDING in the charter, press the quorum selector with what you have on the table today and review the thresholds by state; a guest seat proposed without a threshold does not sit.

Download the AI Board of Directors tool from your library, open LEEME.md and paste into your AI the message it carries with the charter copied from the Boardroom TOGETHER WITH the folder, and behind it the brief and the guest seats this assistant wrote for you.

Which of your data it uses

of 24

This assistant works with 17 of the 24 fields in «My Restaurant», among them Restaurant name, Business type and Cuisine or concept. It does not ask out of curiosity: these are what make the answer speak about YOUR scale instead of an industry average — the same calculation on a business of another size returns a number you cannot decide with.

You fill them once and they apply across the library, so the second assistant you open already starts with them in place. Whatever you leave blank, the assistant asks for one thing at a time instead of inventing it, and says so before answering, so you know what it is working from.

Restaurant nameBusiness typeCuisine or conceptCity and countryNumber of locationsYears in businessTeam sizeYour main guestAverage check (with currency)Menu price rangeActive sales channelsBest-selling dishesWhat makes you differentAverage monthly salesApproximate food cost (%)Approximate labor cost (%)Main goal this year

Always up to date

Every assistant carries a visible version and date. When an AI changes how it works, the assistant's version goes up and you see what changed.

v1.4.02026-10-30Diego F. Parra, 2026-10-30, on seeing the Boardroom use cases: they lacked the elements of the MR board engine and the board's graphics from the prompt catalogue. Piece Eight now carries what the engine's board (_MR_JuntaDirectivaAi, universal 1.1.0+u1.0.0) and its panel show of a session: the status strip, the eight steps with what happened in each, cross-checks as threads on the table, the fourteen guardians with their outcome, each seat's MASTERESTAURANT layer profile, the radar of the six fronts and the minutes with the question. Consolidation follows contract mr-junta/1: a front with nobody seated is NOT CONVENED (it used to be UNVERIFIED), finance weighs double, cut-offs 8 / 6.25 / 4.5 and three hard rules. DUEL scores both options; AUDIT does not vote: findings by money at stake. Six charts, not four. The Sazón de Origen example was rebuilt with the same builder and its scoreboard re-read with the contract (financial orange, human amber, brand and legal NOT CONVENED; the global stays orange).

v1.3.02026-10-08Diego's instruction (2026-10-08): «review what we have of the board-of-directors-with-agents creator and make sure it carries the example of the architecture we built recently and the newest structure … turn it into a new engine _MR_JuntaDirectivaAi … with the universal version beside it». The board now has its own engine and universal folder (_MR_JuntaDirectivaAiUniversal 1.0.0+u1.0.0): seats with deep profile and layer joined, the session's architecture as data, the charter and the minutes as template and schema, three sample minutes and the animated panel. The body gains the method's eighth step —the session's architecture, with the panel and the minutes as yardstick— and the Boardroom shows the line of the eight steps. Title per the creators' rule (docs/72); the slug does not change.

v1.2.02026-09-23Commissioned by Diego F. Parra on 2026-09-23: document every agent and every guardian so they are reusable, truly expert for restaurants, food-service and hospitality businesses, and fluent in the MASTERESTAURANT methodology and tools, both in the engine documentation and in this prompt's download. The package now carries the MASTERESTAURANT layer in capa_masterestaurant/: the 23 seats and the 14 guardians documented for a running business, with the house methodology and tools (doc 57). Piece Three now also justifies each quorum seat with that layer. The deliverable's shape does not change, so the Sazón de Origen example still holds and was resealed.

v1.1.02026-09-16Diego F. Parra, 2026-09-16: make the deliverable stronger, more visual, interactive and executive, in HTML. The seven pieces do not change; how they arrive does: the BOARDROOM, one HTML file on the MASTERESTAURANT Visual Kit (ROLE, TASK, RESULT FORMAT, BEFORE DELIVERING and NEXT STEP, ES and EN), with what makes each piece usable —the verdict in cards and its chart against the yardstick, the editable charter copied with one button, the quorum that lights up by object, the thresholds with a state filter and the three-figure chart, the folded guests, the brief with its mode, the calendar with the switch-off date worked out—. Hence it requires the `archivos` capability and only recommends Claude. The public example is the Boardroom of Sazón de Origen, actually built (25 checks green). And, same day, piece eight: the first session's table with every expert seated —icon and canonical name of the AI Board, a port of the MTIE's junta_pane.js—, its criteria in colour, its provisional vote, the scoreboard by front with the package's scoring model and the simulation notice.

v1.0.02026-09-14Initial version. Commissioned by Diego F. Parra on 2026-09-14: "create a new expert-agent board of directors builder prompt; its file kit is in the _MTIEJuntaDirectivaUniversal folder; review that folder's full documentation; expert behaviour". The whole package was read (40 files: 23 mtie-experto/3.0 profiles, 14 guardians, 4 modes, protocol 0-7, minutes, brief, spreadsheet schema, threshold-adaptation method). Born as a BUILDER (doc 35 §5): the table exists and is downloaded as kit `juntadirectiva`; THIS restaurant's board —yardstick, charter, quorum, recalibrated thresholds, guest seats, brief, governance— does not exist until the AI builds it with this prompt. Sibling of MPV-1129 (Agent Builder by Role) in c35.