AI assistant · N5 Complete system
AI Agent Builder by Role for Restaurants
You pick which agent to create —one of the MASTERESTAURANT firm's seven departments (Marketing, Commercial, Management Control, Finance, Operations, Chief of Staff, AI Transformation), a corporate chef, purchasing, people and culture, or your own written in your words— and out comes the whole figure: its team and competencies, the weekly inputs, what it remembers, what it decides alone and what it never touches, and the agent's prompt ready to paste, with the department's package of files.
N5Complete system
Several chained pieces you install and operate over time, with their review cadence. It changes how the business runs, not one decision.
◆ This assistant 110 of the 164 published assistants are at this levelIs this for you?
What it does and what you get
- One agent per task means forty agents nobody maintains; one agent per ROLE means seven somebody can actually manage.
- This assistant designs the AI figure that holds a seat in your house, with the same structure used to write a human role: which competencies it carries —five minimum, or it is not a role but a task—, which inputs it needs weekly and where they come from in YOUR house, what it remembers between sessions, and the limit in three columns where the third —what it never touches— is written first, because an agent with no written limit ends up changing a price.
- And it carries the option to define your own role, so you depend on nobody's list.
- It comes out with the agent's prompt ready to paste and with the business figure that should move at ninety days.
What you end up with
The agent's full figure: its seat in three lines; the competency table with the question each one answers and the input it needs; the input table with where each figure comes from, its format and whether it exists today; memory —what it remembers, where it lives and who updates it—; the limit in three columns with a cash cap on the first; the cadence with its day, deliverable and recipient; the five-step start-up with the test against an old week; the ninety-day measure with baseline, target, owner and shutdown rule; and the AGENT'S PROMPT ready to paste, with its limits inside.
EXAMPLE This is what you getAn example built with Sazón de Origen, the house's fictional restaurant.Not your data: your result is built with YOUR restaurant's.See the full example →Sample result
The owner asked this: «I have three locations and I live putting out operational fires: every manager does the checklists differently and I hear about problems once they have already cost money. I want one agent covering operations, not forty little ones.»
Which figure it resembles: the Operations Director a three-to-ten restaurant group would have — the one who is in no kitchen and knows what happens in all three.
Why it exists: so you read on Monday, on one page, what today you find out on Thursday through a complaint.
If nobody holds this seat: nobody consolidates the three locations' checklists, findings repeat because nobody counts them, and deviations only show up once they have passed through the P&L.
Note what it does NOT cover: it is not a cost agent or a marketing agent. An agent covering operations and costs at once covers neither, because those two questions are answered with different data on different cadences.
| Competency | The question it can answer | Input it needs |
|---|---|---|
| Operational audit | What went off standard this week and at which location? | Signed checklists |
| Shift and area checklists | Which were filled and which were signed unfilled? | The same, with times |
| Manuals and procedures | Which finding repeats because the procedure is badly written? | 8 weeks of history |
| Quality and food safety | Did any chiller go out of range and what was done? | Temperature sheet |
| Maintenance | Which equipment is going to fail before it fails? | Fault report |
| Multi-site consolidation | Which location is doing worse, and at what exactly? | All three, together |
Six, not two. With two competencies this would not be a role: it would be a task, and a loose prompt from this library serves a task better.
| ✋ NEVER TOUCHES | 📝 Proposes and waits for a signature | ✅ Decides alone (with cap) |
|---|---|---|
| Changing a menu price | Changing a written procedure | The order the week is audited in |
| Hiring or firing | Pulling a dish off the menu | Which finding goes into Monday's 3 alerts |
| Approving equipment investment | Buying a part above 300,000 COP | Asking for evidence on a blank signed checklist |
| Talking to a supplier | Moving staff between locations | Minor parts up to 300,000 COP |
| Writing to a guest |
The left column is written before the other two. An agent without it ends up changing a price, and that is not undone with an apology.
Illustrative example generated with a fictional restaurant. Not a promise of results, not a client case.
This is 3 of 5 parts. Behind the wall are the two pieces that make the agent survive its first month. Inputs, memory and cadence: the five figures it needs weekly with where each comes from in your house, in what format they arrive and which do NOT exist yet with the plan to get them within seven days —because an agent that asks for something you do not have switches itself off—; the ten things it remembers between sessions, where they live and who updates them; and the exact day, the deliverable and the minutes it should take to read. And the start-up with its measure: the five steps of day one, the test against a week that has ALREADY happened and whose outcome you know —if it cannot see what you already know, it will not see it next week—, the business figure that should move at ninety days with its baseline and target, the written shutdown rule, and the complete AGENT'S PROMPT ready to paste into your AI, with the third column's limits written inside.
See the full example — free accountWorks with these AIs
How to use it
Which of your data it uses
This assistant works with 14 of the 23 fields in «My Restaurant», among them Restaurant name, Business type and Cuisine or concept. It does not ask out of curiosity: these are what make the answer speak about YOUR scale instead of an industry average — the same calculation on a business of another size returns a number you cannot decide with. You fill them once and they apply across the library, so the second assistant you open already starts with them in place. Whatever you leave blank, the assistant asks for one thing at a time instead of inventing it, and says so before answering, so you know what it is working from.
Always up to date
Every assistant carries a visible version and date. When an AI changes how it works, the assistant's version goes up and you see what changed.
v1.2.02026-09-23Diego's instruction (2026-09-23): «in each agent a button called create my own agent that leads to that agent's creation prompt; let's centralise one single agent-creation prompt with the selector of the others, with the package of files they need to work professionally and not superficially». The selector now carries the firm's seven departments (derived from datos/agentes by motor/creadores.py, with their team, jobs, brief, cycle and limits), three roles no department covers and «an agent I define» with free text; the section «The seven departments and the package» is born, and so is the Agent Creator package (kits/creador-de-agentes).v1.1.02026-08-30Diego's instruction (2026-08-30): «agents are supposed to handle things automatically and improve themselves, recurrently, without the human having to step in». The card designed the figure and stopped there: seven layers and none said how the agent improves after month one. The EIGHTH LAYER enters —improvement—: which signal each run leaves, who writes it (the owner, never the model), where it lives, and the monthly 20-minute review with its only three outcomes —adjust a competency, change an input, switch it off. And the final prompt gains a LEARNED-SIGNALS SLOT, which is what turns a fixed prompt into an agent that improves. The honesty goes in the ROLE and not in a footnote: an agent claiming to improve with no signal is inventing, and one inventing its own yardstick is worse than one that does not learn.v1.0.12026-08-27The response-ladder doctrine is stated in English with the house phrase —«continue with a marked assumption»— and not with a synonym. The migration probe caught it: 34 migrated bodies in Spanish and 27 in English, and the seven-card gap were the ones I wrote today. A doctrine said two ways stops being greppable.v1.0.02026-08-27Diego's instruction (2026-08-27): «we are NOT making more agents, we are not making 47 agents; what I want is to organise that into powerful prompts that build a few key agents with names and functions like a person in a large restaurant company, with multiple capabilities matching that seat». This card absorbs the 47 in c35: instead of forty-seven one-task agents, seven role figures with five or six competencies inside, plus the option to define your own role so the owner depends on nobody's list.More assistants in this category
Not a one-shot prompt: an agent you install that works every week — takes your figures, updates the logbook, r…
N5 · Complete systemThe table already exists and you can download it: twenty-three experts with deep profiles and fourteen guardia…
Included in the always-growing library
Access to every published assistant, adapted to your AI and personalised with your restaurant's data, updates included.