AI assistant · N4 Executable plan
Positive Review Reply Builder for Restaurants
Writes the replies to four and five-star reviews: sorts them by what each one brings, hands out a long reply or a short line accordingly, and leaves every long reply with a quotable dish and a concrete ask aimed at a slot that still has chairs.
N4Executable plan
A plan with owners, deadlines and the metric you review. Not advice: an agenda someone can execute on Monday.
◆ This assistant 23 of the 164 published assistants are at this levelIs this for you?
What it does and what you get
- A good review is the only sales piece a guest writes for free, and almost nobody answers it.
- Answering all of them with the same sentence looks worse than not answering: forty identical replies on one screen teach the mould before the message.
- This assistant separates the ones that bring something —a dish, a person, an hour— from the two-line ones, writes each differently, and puts into the long ones the noun a stranger can order and the ask that whoever wrote well will actually accept.
- The negative review does not belong here: that one protects, this one cashes in.
What you end up with
Five chained blocks: the triage table with its discard rule, the replies written one by one in a long and a short version, the ask table with its slot and its review date, the bank of eight openings and eight closings, and the weekly routine with a cut-off hour.
EXAMPLE This is what you getAn example built with Sazón de Origen, the house's fictional restaurant.Not your data: your result is built with YOUR restaurant's.See the full example →Sample result
The owner asked this: "I have 31 four and five-star reviews from the last two months across Google and the delivery platform, and I have answered none of them. I do not want to send the same sentence forty times."
31 four and five-star reviews in 60 days: 19 on the Google map and 12 on the delivery platform. None answered. The queue is not ordered by date or by stars, but by what each review brings with it.
| Type | How many | What gets done | Why |
|---|---|---|---|
| Names a dish, a person or a moment | 9 | Long reply of 55 to 70 words, signed | It brings raw material: something concrete to repeat in front of the reader |
| Four stars with a "but" | 5 | Long reply, first in the queue | It is the only place a stranger sees that somebody here listens |
| Two lines, no content, under 45 days | 12 | One 20-word line, no dish and no ask | Spending the good reply on "All very good" throws it away |
| Two lines, over 45 days | 5 | No reply | Answering two months late tells the reader that nobody here is watching |
That is 14 long replies and 12 short lines. At six minutes for a long one and one for a short one, 96 minutes: an hour and a half of a Tuesday, not a project.
What was ruled out, and why. Three of the nine that name something are past 21 days, and the clock rule would send them to the short line. It gets broken here on purpose: what they bring —the server's name, a Sunday sancocho— still works today for whoever is comparing restaurants on the map, and the short line wastes it. They get the long reply, without pretending it happened yesterday.
Answering all 31 was ruled out too. Thirty-one replies in a row on the same screen, written on the same Tuesday, read like exactly what they would be: a batch. The two-line review with two months on it goes unanswered and nothing happens; last week's two-liner gets a line that differs from the one beside it.
Three long ones and two short ones, so the difference shows. None opens the same way and no two are signed by the same person.
Google, 5 stars, 6 days ago. "The sancocho de tres carnes is on another level. We went on a Sunday with my mother and Yuli served us, very attentive."
Dona Claudia, Yuli read your review on Monday and it made her day. The Sancocho de tres carnes goes on the stove at six in the morning, which is why it runs out early on Sundays. If you come back with your mother, order the Trucha al ajillo on a Saturday at midday: there is a table with no wait and the kitchen is free for it. — Andres, Laureles location
Delivery platform, 5 stars, 3 days ago. "Arrived hot and well packed. The bandeja was loaded."
Thank you for the note on the packing: the rice and the egg travel separately exactly for that. The Bandeja de la casa is what leaves most through this channel, and the one almost nobody orders is the Trucha al ajillo, which takes the trip better than it looks. Thursday night it goes out faster, when the kitchen has room. — Andres
Google, 4 stars, 11 days ago. "Very good food, though we waited 25 minutes for a table at midday."
You are right about the 25 minutes: between 12:15 and 1:30, Tuesday to Friday, the room fills and we cannot turn tables fast enough. From this week we are writing down the arrival time of every table to see where it jams. If it helps, Saturday midday you walk straight in and the menu is the same. — Andres, Laureles location
No formal apology here and no comped courtesy: that lives with the negative review. A "but" inside four stars gets named with its hour and answered with a fact.
The two short ones, 20 words, no dish and no ask.
"Excellent, everything." → Thank you, don Jorge. We will be here. — Andres
"All very good." → Good thing to read on a Monday, Marcela. Thank you for writing it. — Yuli
The ask goes where people are missing, not where they already crowd.
| Review | Concrete ask | Proposed slot | How the return is verified | Review date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claudia, Google, 5 stars | Come back with her mother and order Trucha al ajillo | Saturday midday | Booking under her name in the floor book | 24 September |
| Order 8841, delivery platform, 5 stars | Try the Trucha al ajillo on delivery | Thursday 7:00 to 9:00 p.m. | Trucha on an order from the same address | 24 September |
| Jorge Ivan, Google, 4 stars with a "but" | Come back with no queue, same menu | Saturday midday | Table seated between 12:00 and 1:00 with no wait | 24 September |
| Marcela, Google, 5 stars, two lines | None | — | — | — |
The ask that got cut. The owner wanted to write "come back on a Tuesday". Ruled out: Tuesday-to-Friday lunch already fills on its own, and moving a guest from one full lunch to another adds no cover, it only changes the chair. The two slow slots in this house are Saturday midday and Tuesday-to-Thursday nights, and that is where the three asks land.
The dish is not chosen by taste either. The Bandeja de la casa and the Sancocho de tres carnes are the workhorse: they sell themselves. The reply line is menu space nobody pays for, and it gets spent on the Trucha al ajillo. Of the 14 long replies, the Trucha is named in 4: under the one-third cap.
SUPUESTO: that the Trucha carries the best contribution margin of the three comes from the price order and the declared ingredient cost, not from an industry margin: the house does not hard-code that figure. Confirm it against your recipe costing. If the Trucha turned out to be the worst margin, the quotable noun in all 14 long replies changes and this block gets rebuilt.
What gets counted at 30 days. If 4 of the 14 come back, that is 192,000 COP at an average check of 48,000 COP. Illustrative figures, built from the data you gave. The figure that really matters next month is a different one: how many of those who came back brought somebody with them.
Illustrative example generated with a fictional restaurant. Not a promise of results, not a client case.
This is 3 of 5 parts. Behind the wall sit the two pieces that make this repeat without turning back into a template. The bank: eight numbered openings with the exact situation each one fits and eight closings with their rule of use —four end in an ask with a day and a slot, two in the name of whoever signs, two by handing the word back to the kitchen— plus the three batch rules: no opening repeats within the month, no dish passes a third of the long replies (with 14 long ones, a cap of 4 per dish) and the split between signers goes by location, not by day. And the Tuesday routine, cut off at 10:30 a.m.: pull the list, triage, four-star ones first, the repetition check read out loud, and the two figures of the month's last Tuesday.
See the full example — free accountWorks with these AIs
How to use it
Which of your data it uses
This assistant works with 7 of the 23 fields in «My Restaurant», among them Restaurant name, City and country and Best-selling dishes. It does not ask out of curiosity: these are what make the answer speak about YOUR scale instead of an industry average — the same calculation on a business of another size returns a number you cannot decide with. You fill them once and they apply across the library, so the second assistant you open already starts with them in place. Whatever you leave blank, the assistant asks for one thing at a time instead of inventing it, and says so before answering, so you know what it is working from.
Always up to date
Every assistant carries a visible version and date. When an AI changes how it works, the assistant's version goes up and you see what changed.
v1.1.12026-08-26The body stops contradicting the answer ladder. It used to say «do not move on until it arrives», the very order the ladder was born to replace: the assistant asked the owner for what the owner does not have and stalled. It now says what the house doctrine says — ask one at a time, and if they do not know, continue with a marked assumption. FORMAT OF THE RESULT was not touched, so the example still corresponds and its seal moves up with the card.v1.1.02026-08-25Body revised to pay down duelo debt: it scored 81.8 out of 90.0, and the two signals it lacked were at ZERO and on the floor for the same reason. `lexico` at 0 of 10: the card already ordered picking the dish with «the better margin» and already knew that moving people from one full slot to another adds nothing, but it said so in paraphrase — it is now called contribution margin, recipe costing, workhorse, covers, occupancy, sales channel, delivery, sales mix and average ticket, which is what the trade calls what the card was already doing. `cifras` at 4 of 12: the card's clock —72 hours, 21 days— was right, but the batch's cost lived only in the example; the TASK now states it as 6 min per long reply and 1 min per short one, and the 45 days of the discard rule and the 8 weeks of the review are added. The fifth BEFORE YOU DELIVER check is added, along with the SUPUESTO: line for the quotable dish's margin, which is the one place this card leaned on a figure it cannot vouch for. The kit is regenerated at the new version and shows that line. Rises to 94.4.v1.0.02026-08-25The assistant is born.Same method, another variant
Inside the app this is a single control: you press it and the assistant reframes itself, including the variants that don't appear here because they don't have their own page yet.
More assistants in this category
Writes the messages your restaurant answers automatically -welcome, booking, delivery, opening hours, address,…
N4 · Executable planBuilds the flow your restaurant uses to win back a guest who left angry: who enters and who does not, the priv…
N4 · Executable planWrites the protocol for the first hours when something turns against you online: three levels with countable c…
Included in the always-growing library
Access to every published assistant, adapted to your AI and personalised with your restaurant's data, updates included.
