AI assistant · N5 Complete system
Cycle System Architect for Restaurants
Not one cycle: the whole ring. Which decisions your house takes today without a figure, which cycles feed them, which day each runs, who sustains it, how one's output enters the next, in what order they are switched on, and how many hours a week the whole system costs. With the pruning rule written for when the load is exceeded.
N5Complete system
Several chained pieces you install and operate over time, with their review cadence. It changes how the business runs, not one decision.
◆ This assistant 110 of the 164 published assistants are at this levelIs this for you?
What it does and what you get
- Most management systems die of excess: five routines get switched on the same Monday and within a month none is left.
- This assistant does the opposite — it decides how many cycles your house can hold with the people it has, orders them by the decision they feed rather than by department, seams them together so one's output is the next one's input, and switches them on one at a time with a date and a passing condition.
- Out comes the ring map on one page and the prompt to review it every quarter in your own AI.
What you end up with
The decision map with those taken today without a figure; the four questions with their answer or named gap; the minimum ring of 2 to 5 cycles with the verdict on how many the house holds; the seams table saying what leaves one cycle and which one it enters; the crossed one-month calendar; owners, readers and waiting list; the switch-on order with dates and passing condition; and the load in hours a week with the pruning rule. At the end, the ring map on one page and the system prompt to review it every quarter.
EXAMPLE This is what you getAn example built with Sazón de Origen, the house's fictional restaurant.Not your data: your result is built with YOUR restaurant's.See the full example →Sample result
The owner asked this: «I have two locations and there are eight of us on the admin side, counting me. I have started about five different routines this year —one for costs, one for reviews, one for content— and none lasted more than a month. I do not know whether I lack order or they are simply too many.»
| Decision | How often | Who decides | With a figure today? |
|---|---|---|---|
| What gets bought and from whom | Weekly | Chef | No |
| What gets promoted | Monthly | You | No |
| Which price goes up | Quarterly | You | Partial |
| Who gets hired | On urgency | Site manager | No |
The three decisions without a figure are where the ring is born. The rest can wait.
Am I making money? Yes, from your accountant's monthly P&L.
Am I selling more? Halfway: you have sales, not ticket or repurchase.
Do I operate the same on both shifts? You do not know. Named gap.
Do they come back? You do not know, neither customers nor team. Named gap.
Two gaps are two pending cycles, not two failures. And they do not get switched on together.
Illustrative example generated with a fictional restaurant. Not a promise of results, not a client case.
This is 2 of 5 parts. Behind the wall is what prevents the expensive mistake: the verdict on how many cycles your house really holds, the seams that turn loose routines into a ring, and the one-at-a-time switch-on order with its passing condition. Plus the one-page map and the prompt to review the system every quarter.
See the full example — free accountWorks with these AIs
How to use it
Which of your data it uses
This assistant works with 14 of the 23 fields in «My Restaurant», among them Restaurant name, Business type and Cuisine or concept. It does not ask out of curiosity: these are what make the answer speak about YOUR scale instead of an industry average — the same calculation on a business of another size returns a number you cannot decide with. You fill them once and they apply across the library, so the second assistant you open already starts with them in place. Whatever you leave blank, the assistant asks for one thing at a time instead of inventing it, and says so before answering, so you know what it is working from.
Always up to date
Every assistant carries a visible version and date. When an AI changes how it works, the assistant's version goes up and you see what changed.
v1.1.02026-09-23Diego's instruction (2026-09-23): «the difference between the cycle builder and the cycle-system architect is not clear, see if they can be unified». Measured: the same discipline at two levels —one routine (MPV-1130) versus the whole ring (this one)—. They are unified with the SCOPE selector in navigate mode: one entry with a switch, each option leads to its published card and no URL is retired.v1.0.02026-08-29Diego's instruction (2026-08-29), the system half: «so the client does not depend on our platform but can build their own in Claude». Elder sibling of MPV-1130: that one builds ONE cycle, this one decides HOW MANY and in what order. The boundary is stated inside and not in a separate document, because this trade's expensive mistake is not designing a cycle badly — it is switching on five and sustaining zero.Same method, another variant
Inside the app this is a single control: you press it and the assistant reframes itself, including the variants that don't appear here because they don't have their own page yet.
More assistants in this category
The board of boards: the census of the cells you fill by hand, which ones can fill THEMSELVES with what you al…
N5 · Complete systemYou bring a routine you already do by hand —reviewing the month's numbers, tidying up what came out of the mee…
N5 · Complete systemThe tool is already built and you can download it: what's missing is making it YOURS. This assistant produces …
Included in the always-growing library
Access to every published assistant, adapted to your AI and personalised with your restaurant's data, updates included.
