AI assistant · N4 Executable plan
Daily Cash Desk Checklist Builder for Restaurants
Writes the daily method for your restaurant's money in four named phases —desk opening, control during service, close and count, and channel reconciliation—, with the expected-cash arithmetic, a tolerance declared in pesos and the four boxes money leaks through.
N4Executable plan
A plan with owners, deadlines and the metric you review. Not advice: an agenda someone can execute on Monday.
◆ This assistant 23 of the 164 published assistants are at this levelIs this for you?
What it does and what you get
- A restaurant's money never vanishes all at once: it leaves through the discount nobody authorised, the void keyed after the check was paid, the tip that never reaches whoever earned it, and the platform sale that settles fifteen days later while nobody chases it.
- None of those leaks is visible from the kitchen or the dining room, because they leave no dirty plate and no unhappy guest.
- This assistant covers the money's whole day, not just closing time: the count subtraction written out, the tolerance in pesos and the separation rule between whoever counts and whoever verifies.
What you end up with
Five chained deliverables: the money route as a table, the count sheet with its arithmetic and tolerance, the four leak boxes with authoriser and ceiling, the reconciliation board by channel and the printable half-page checklist.
EXAMPLE This is what you getAn example built with Sazón de Origen, the house's fictional restaurant.Not your data: your result is built with YOUR restaurant's.See the full example →Sample result
The owner asked this: "I have two cash desks, one per location, and the count comes out different every month with nobody able to say why. I bill 214,000,000 COP a month across the dining room, my own delivery and a delivery platform."
One written route, the same in both locations. Today the money at Sazón de Origen passes through four hands between the docket and the deposit, and nobody signs. Here is the route, with the rule that holds it up: whoever counts does not verify.
| Moment | Who | What is counted | Signature | Time |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Opening | Shift cashier | 200,000 COP change float, denomination by denomination | Cashier and shift lead | 11:15 a.m. |
| Cash drop | Shift lead | Sealed envelope, once the drawer passes 400,000 COP | Whoever drops and whoever stores | On crossing the cap |
| Last charge | Shift cashier | Card terminal closed and batch total written down | Cashier | 3:20 p.m. |
| Count | Shift cashier | Cash, vouchers and transfer receipts | Cashier | 3:35 p.m. |
| Verification | Admin | Blind recount against the point-of-sale report | Whoever verifies | 3:50 p.m. |
| Deposit | Shift lead | Envelope with number, amount and destination | Whoever banks it | Before 5:00 p.m. |
Why a 200,000 COP float. With 74 covers per location per day, an average check of 48,000 COP and a menu between 28,000 and 72,000 COP, the change for a lunch shift is covered by 200,000 COP split into 2,000, 5,000, 10,000 and 20,000 notes. The float does not pay for delivery riders, groceries or anybody's taxi: every outflow that is not change breaks the count arithmetic and cannot be rebuilt. Illustrative figures, built from the data you gave.
Tuesday, Laureles location, lunch shift: 61 covers served and 2,928,000 COP in sales.
| Item | Point of sale | Counted | Difference | Signed explanation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash sales | 1,024,000 COP | — | — | — |
| Change float | 200,000 COP | 200,000 COP | 0 | Handed over 11:15 a.m. |
| Cash drops | −600,000 COP | −600,000 COP | 0 | One envelope, 1:40 p.m. |
| Expected cash | 624,000 COP | 620,500 COP | −3,500 COP | Overpaid change, table 7 |
| Cards | 1,312,000 COP | 1,312,000 COP | 0 | Batch closed 3:20 p.m. |
| Transfers | 342,000 COP | 342,000 COP | 0 | Three receipts |
| Delivery platform | 250,000 COP | — | Outstanding | Settles at 15 days |
| Tips, outside the count | 146,400 COP | 146,400 COP | 0 | Separate envelope, signed |
The arithmetic, written and not implied: expected cash = 1,024,000 + 200,000 − 600,000 = 624,000 COP. Counted, 620,500 COP. Difference, −3,500 COP: inside the 5,000 COP tolerance per shift, explained and signed by the cashier and by whoever verified.
What happens above tolerance. Between 5,000 and 20,000 COP it is explained in writing that same afternoon and two people sign. Over 20,000 COP the drawer does not close until the shift's voids and discounts are reviewed, and the shift lead signs. Tips —146,400 COP, 5 % of the shift's sales— were counted apart and never entered expected cash: mixing them is the quickest way to make a shortfall look like a balance. Illustrative figures.
The four boxes are the four doors money walks out of without the kitchen ever noticing.
| Leak | Who authorises | Ceiling | Evidence | Who reviews |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Discounts and comps | Shift lead, with a code in their name | 15 % of the check and 3 comps per shift | Reason on the docket and a report by person | Admin, next day |
| Void after the check is printed | Shift lead | 2 % of the shift's checks | Voided docket with written reason and signature | Admin, same day |
| Tips | A written rule, not a person | Published split, paid on the 5th | Envelope counted apart and a signed sheet | Whoever verifies the count |
| Channel reconciliation | Admin | Nothing outstanding at 30 days | Card batch, bank statement and payout | You, at month's end |
Two boxes were crossed on Tuesday. Of 24 checks in the shift, 2 were voided after printing —96,000 COP, 8.3 % against the 2 % ceiling— and both came from the same code, shared today by the four cashiers of both locations. Authorised discounts added up to 112,000 COP, 3.8 % of the shift's sales, inside the ceiling.
The separation rule, written as a criterion and not as suspicion of the team: whoever authorises the discount does not apply it, and whoever counts the cash is not the one who verifies it. With a code per person and rotation every 30 days, the discount report stops being a total and becomes a list with names. Illustrative figures.
Illustrative example generated with a fictional restaurant. Not a promise of results, not a client case.
This is 3 of 5 parts. Behind the wall sit the two pieces that get executed. The month's reconciliation board, with the columns Channel, Registered sales, Commission, Settled, Outstanding and Lag in days for cash, cards, transfers and the delivery platform: that is where the row nobody looks at shows up, the 1,824,000 COP the point of sale registered and the payout never carried, with the 30-day claim rule and the commission translated into points of food cost. And the half-page checklist that lives inside the till, hour by hour from 11:15 a.m.: the float with two signatures, the drop once the drawer passes 400,000 COP, the 3:20 batch close, the count subtraction written out in full and the 3:50 blind recount, with the 5,000 COP cut that forces a signed explanation and the 20,000 COP cut that keeps the drawer open.
See the full example — free accountWorks with these AIs
How to use it
Which of your data it uses
This assistant works with 10 of the 23 fields in «My Restaurant», among them Restaurant name, Business type and Number of locations. It does not ask out of curiosity: these are what make the answer speak about YOUR scale instead of an industry average — the same calculation on a business of another size returns a number you cannot decide with. You fill them once and they apply across the library, so the second assistant you open already starts with them in place. Whatever you leave blank, the assistant asks for one thing at a time instead of inventing it, and says so before answering, so you know what it is working from.
Always up to date
Every assistant carries a visible version and date. When an AI changes how it works, the assistant's version goes up and you see what changed.
v1.0.22026-09-23Professional document audit (2026-09-23): the card read the number of locations as the number of drawers, and one location can have several. It now asks for each location's drawers.v1.0.12026-08-26The body stops contradicting the answer ladder. It used to say «do not move on until it arrives», the very order the ladder was born to replace: the assistant asked the owner for what the owner does not have and stalled. It now says what the house doctrine says — ask one at a time, and if they do not know, continue with a marked assumption. FORMAT OF THE RESULT was not touched, so the example still corresponds and its seal moves up with the card.v1.0.02026-08-25The assistant is born.Same method, another variant
Inside the app this is a single control: you press it and the assistant reframes itself, including the variants that don't appear here because they don't have their own page yet.
More assistants in this category
Builds the checklist your restaurant opens with: the walk through the venue in blocks, every box with its meas…
N4 · Executable planWrites your restaurant's closing checklist in five named phases —product, money, premises, station and shift h…
N4 · Executable planWrites the daily kitchen station checklist in five phases that follow the product —receiving, storage, product…
Included in the always-growing library
Access to every published assistant, adapted to your AI and personalised with your restaurant's data, updates included.