Who is this assistant for?

You have twenty pending items all shouting at the same volume and a week that fits three. Every time you add a priority you subtract none, and the list only grows. You end the week exhausted and with the feeling that nothing that matters moved.

The owner's enemy is usually not laziness but dispersion: twenty pending items shouting at the same volume and a day with room for five. This assistant runs the triage a director would run coldly: it weighs each item by its contribution to profit and its cost to execute, picks three priorities, and — the part almost nobody does — builds the list of what you will STOP doing so the chosen three can breathe.

AI assistant · N3 Analysis with a verdict

◆ Included in the annual plan🎯 General Management and Strategyv1.1.0 · 2026-08-13

Strategic Priorities Builder for Restaurants

Takes everything on your plate, weighs it by its effect on profit, and returns three defensible priorities, a stop-doing list, and the calendar to protect them.

Depth

8/23

Your data

Compatible AIs

Steps to use it

Depth of the resulttap a level to see what you get

◀ Put out today's fireRun the year ▶

📊

N3Analysis with a verdict

Crosses YOUR numbers and takes a stand, with a table, units and currency. Not options: a recommendation you can defend.

◆ This assistant 24 of the 164 published assistants are at this level

Is this for you?

What it does and what you get

The owner's enemy is usually not laziness but dispersion: twenty pending items shouting at the same volume and a day with room for five.
This assistant runs the triage a director would run coldly: it weighs each item by its contribution to profit and its cost to execute, picks three priorities, and — the part almost nobody does — builds the list of what you will STOP doing so the chosen three can breathe.

What you end up with

A triage matrix with every pending item scored, the three chosen priorities with their economic rationale, the stop-doing list with what each renunciation frees up, and a weekly calendar block to work them.

EXAMPLE This is what you getAn example built with Sazón de Origen, the house's fictional restaurant.Not your data: your result is built with YOUR restaurant's.See the full example →

Sample result

Sazón de OrigenFictional contemporary Colombian restaurant in Medellín, 2 locations, 6 years in business. Every sample result in the library comes from this same case. Fictional restaurant

The owner asked this: «Here is my list of 19 pending items. Tell me which three I focus on for the next 12 weeks and what I drop.»

Two rows of this table were not on the owner's list: the assistant added them because the figures give them away. Food cost sits at 34% and the menu has been untouched for eleven months.

Pending item	Profit effect (1-5)	Cost to execute (1-5)	Serves the goal?	Rationale, money per month
Shift grid for location 2 outside lunch	5	3	Yes	28% labor cost applied to low-occupancy hours: ~4,100,000
Portion weights and a scale on the 12 highest-volume items	5	2	Yes	2 points of food cost over 60% of sales: ~2,600,000
Differentiated pricing on the delivery platform	4	2	Yes	The platform moves ~13% of sales; 6 points of difference: ~1,700,000
(added) Menu mix review, untouched for 11 months	4	3	Yes	Cost drift not passed on across the 6 best sellers: ~1,900,000
Wine list	2	2	Partly	Ticket +1.2% on the tables that order it: ~500,000
Weekday breakfasts	3	5	Partly	A new line: it needs its own math before competing here
Replace the POS system	2	5	No	Zero a month, 11,000,000 of investment and 3 weeks of friction
Redesign the logo	1	3	No	No measurable effect on the year's goal
… 11 more pending items				Scored on the same yardstick

SUPUESTO: profit effect was calculated with the contribution margin implied by the declared prime cost (62%). If the real margin were 5 points lower, every figure in the last column drops proportionally; the ORDER of the table does not change, but the chosen three would take 16 weeks to pay what they pay here in 12.

The three for the next 12 weeks

#	Priority	Expected profit per month	First action, this Monday
1	Shift grid for location 2 outside lunch	4,100,000	Pull sales by time band for the last 8 weeks
2	Portion weights and costing for the 12 highest-volume items	2,600,000	Weigh the Bandeja de la casa across three straight services
3	Differentiated pricing on the delivery platform	1,700,000	Compare the margin of a platform order against a dining-room one

Together they are worth 8,400,000 a month, close to 3.9 points of margin on 214,000,000. The year's goal asks for 6 points in twelve months: these three bring two thirds of it in twelve weeks. The first ties with the second on money, but the second goes earlier in the order because portion weights are what fund the conversation with the platform.

What gets dropped so they fit

Dropped	Where it goes	Frees up
Replacing the POS	Postponed with a date: re-enters when a third location is on the route	2 weekly hours of the owner through the quarter
Logo redesign	Killed, and said out loud	1 weekly hour of the owner and 4,500,000
Weekday breakfasts	To the waiting list: re-enters once it has its own math	5 weekly hours of the head chef
Answering the platform review by review	Delegated to the manager	3 weekly hours of the owner

The subtraction, in front of the owner: the three priorities ask 6 weekly hours of his. The sacrifices free exactly 6 —2 from the postponed POS, 1 from the logo, 3 from the delegated reviews— plus 5 of the head chef's, who carries priority 2. It ties at zero: that is why a fourth priority does not fit, and why these three fit the week the owner has and not the one he wishes he had.

Illustrative example generated with a fictional restaurant. Not a promise of results, not a client case.

This is 2 of 3 parts. Behind the wall are **all 19 rows** with their money rationale, the protected calendar with each priority's weekly block and its named defender, and the 20-minute Monday checklist.

See the full example — free account

Works with these AIs

Claude — the best for this assistant This assistant's whole job is saying no, and it is the one least likely to go soft: it holds the stop-doing list, does the hours subtraction in front of the owner, and does not keep alive out of pity what it already killed.

How to use it

Paste the assistant into your AI and dump your complete pending list, unsorted.

Debate the scores it proposes; you know the business, it brings the cold eye.

Keep the three priorities, publish the stop-doing list, and defend both for six weeks.

Which of your data it uses

of 23

This assistant works with 8 of the 23 fields in «My Restaurant», among them Restaurant name, Business type and Team size. It does not ask out of curiosity: these are what make the answer speak about YOUR scale instead of an industry average — the same calculation on a business of another size returns a number you cannot decide with. You fill them once and they apply across the library, so the second assistant you open already starts with them in place. Whatever you leave blank, the assistant asks for one thing at a time instead of inventing it, and says so before answering, so you know what it is working from.

Restaurant nameBusiness typeTeam sizeStrong and slow daypartsAverage monthly salesApproximate food cost (%)Approximate labor cost (%)Main goal this year